Thursday, March 1, 2012

 
Detroit: What Else Besides Cutting Heads
By Fred P. Leeb

This is the fifth in a series of articles that we are publishing to give our clients, friends and acquaintances examples of how we think differently and utilize our insights and experiences for more creative turnaround solutions. We have applied this type of thinking to develop the most effective turnaround strategies for businesses, governments and nonprofits.

We understand that drastic cuts in Detroit's personnel costs are needed now to buy time and regain financial solvency.  This article, however, discusses how creative solutions could be used to implement some of the more important and far-reaching structural changes that will be required.  These solutions probably would not require additional drastic personnel cuts and may even result in justifiable additions to headcount. These ideas are very applicable to the financial crises facing Detroit and other local governmental units today (on a smaller scale).  In fact, our hands-on experience as the EFM in Pontiac, a microcosm of Detroit, proved that huge tangible and measurable improvements (e.g., two years of surplus in a row after many years of deficits and an upgrade in the city's bond rating when many other cities in better shape were being downgraded) could be accomplished with very few headcount reductions. 
Detroit in the Eye of the Storm
 
The time is right for Detroit to lead the way and be the laboratory for the rest of the country.  Both national political parties are all about jobs, jobs, jobs.  For example, President Obama, in his State of the Union speech on January 24, 2012, said, “Tonight, I want to speak about how we move forward, and lay out a blueprint for an economy that’s built to last -– an economy built on American manufacturing, American energy, skills for American workers, and a renewal of American values.  Now, this blueprint begins with American manufacturing….  And if you want to relocate in a community that was hit hard when a factory left town, you should get help financing a new plant, equipment, or training for new workers.…  Join me in a national commitment to train 2 million Americans with skills that will lead directly to a job….   In the next few weeks, I will sign an executive order clearing away the red tape that slows down too many construction projects.” 

If the proper mix of solutions work in Detroit, there will be a recipe for success that will help to guide other major cities with problems very similar to ours.  Let’s start by noting and understanding some of the actions that other cities already have taken to be successful.  We believe they could be used right now to help Detroit pull itself up by its bootstraps.  Cities all over the world have been facing the same problems—let’s try to learn from their ideas and achievements.
  
 Develop a long-term strategic plan and then pull together.  

Atlantic City assessed its strengths and weaknesses and decided to transform itself into a full-scale entertainment resort.  “That transformation, that vision, is emerging in full bloom.  You can see it this summer.  You can feel the energy all over the city.  It’s really a matter of the type of transformation that Las Vegas scripted over the last five years….  Everyone is excited and understands we’re in it together, and need to work as a team.  That’s a positive thing.  And from what I understand, that’s a new thing for this city.”


Fiat decreased its employment in Turin,the capital of the Italian auto industry, from 140,000 in the early 1970’s to 40,000 in the early 1990’s.  The population declined by almost 30% in 25 years.  In 1993, a new mayor developed a detailed plan with 84 actions for development which were to be completed by 2011.  “It used its own funds, plus money from national, regional, and provincial governments and private companies, to create a range of institutions--business incubators, foundations, research laboratories, venture-capital funds, and technology parks--that would promote its information-technology and green-energy industries….  Turin’s plan worked. By 2006, it posted its lowest levels of unemployment ever and its highest levels of economic activity in half a century. The city reinvented itself as a center for design, not just of cars, but also for aerospace, cinematography, and textiles.” 

Incentivize and encourage the business community to work together with local governments.  
      
 Detroit already has made a good start in this area but probably could progress much more quickly and easily from this type of more coordinated approach.  For example, Oklahoma City developed a transformational strategic plan and then used sales-tax initiatives and tax increment financing to upgrade the downtown and surrounding neighborhoods.  “Today Oklahoma City boasts $400 million in private investment, an NBA franchise and triple-A baseball and hockey teams, and a downtown entertainment district full of clubs, restaurants, condos and offices—all connected by a man-made canal with water taxis.”  Detroit's downtown already has new stadiums, top-flight sports teams, a major university and medical centers but still has a long way to go to provide better housing, schools, retail and entertainment experiences.

Tony Hsieh, CEO of Zappo’s, is rebuilding downtown Las Vegas.  He announced about a year ago that he would be moving his 1,200 employees from his headquarters in the suburbs to the former Las Vegas City Hall building in October 2013.  He plans to convert the neighborhood into “…a new live/work/play destination for Las Vegas’ emerging creative class.  This is the plan (modest it's not): $100 million will go to the purchase of land (not including the new Zappos headquarters) and building acquisition. An additional $100 million will go to residential development including the building of high-rise apartments. Fifty million dollars will go to tech startups Hsieh plans to recruit to the area with seed investments of $100,000 or so apiece. Another $50 million will go toward drawing local small businesses like bakeries, yoga studios, restaurants, coffee shops and other requisite creative-class amenities. And because Hsieh wants people to move here and that requires having decent education for their children, another $50 million will go toward education and the building of -- what else? -- a school system.”

Collect better data, conduct better analyses of that data and make more timely decisions.  

      “For example, Santa Cruz, CA launched an experiment in 2010 using large sets of data and a sophisticated algorithm to forecast when and where crimes were most likely to take place.  The city then began to deploy police officers preemptively to stop them before they occurred.  Does it work?  According to ABC News, property crime dropped 27 percent.”

NYC.gov provides “My NeighborhoodStatistics” with a tremendous amount of information over a wide range of data elements for each of the last five years for each area of the community.  This data would be extremely helpful in managerial decision-making.  For example, under the category of Health, Education and Human Services, the number of deaths are detailed by each major cause such as drug abuse, infant mortality, and lead poisoning.  There also are detailed trend statistics on restaurants requiring reinspection, people with health insurance, people getting cash assistance, substantiated child abuse, children in public schools who have had required immunizations, average daily student attendance, and students meeting or exceeding educational standards.  Under the category of Infrastructure, Administrative and Community Services, there are statistics on acceptably clean sidewalks and streets, air complaints, recycling tons per day, emergency complaints, potholes, and cleanliness of parks and playgrounds.  Under the category of Public Safety and Legal Affairs, there are statistics on fire fatalities, medical emergencies, fires, response times, burglaries, domestic violence, hate crimes and major felonies. 

Identify federally funded megaprojects that will prepare the city for future new investment and create large numbers of both skilled and unskilled jobs that last for years, enabling other investments to grow around them.   

      For example, Aiken, South Carolina received $1.6 billion in stimulus money to hire thousands of workers to decommission old nuclear reactors, install pumps in liquid waste tanks and ship out barrels of solid waste.  “Workers from out of town filled up nearly all of the area’s apartments, hotels and restaurants.  The county’s employment dropped to 8.5% from 10.2% in a matter of months.”

Utilize the global economy as an advantage.   

      Mayor Greg Branch of Saginaw helped to promote the sale of Nexteer Automotive, Saginaw’s biggest remaining industrial employer, to an investment arm of the City of Beijing.  The Chinese company bought the auto-parts maker from General Motors for about $450 million in 2010.  “Today few people in town are wringing their hands about the Chinese.  Inside a 59-year-old factory at Nexteer’s sprawling complex, contractors are ripping out antiquated machine lines and installing new equipment….  The company… has hired more than 100 engineers in Saginaw last year and is looking for 80 more this year….  Chinese delegations are scouring the Midwest for more automotive deals. ”

Encourage platforms for regional cooperation to promote greater efficiency and better service.  

      Oakland County already is providing services to cities and towns in Oakland County and is setting a great example for other cities and counties that could do the same.  Another local government setting the pace for others is Charlotte, North Carolina which developed a Business Support Services unit to provide “information technology, procurement, fleet, and public safety communications services not only to the city but also to Mecklenberg County, smaller rural cities and towns and state and federal agencies throughout the area.” 
  
Conclusion

      In our prior article, we made the point that Detroit must take advantage of being the nation’s poster child for major cities that need revitalization and new jobs.  The purpose of this would be to use our prominent position to get the huge amount of attention and resources that we will need to get the job done.  We know that even if large short-term cost cuts are implemented quickly, they will not create long-term structural changes or bring in large amounts of additional revenue to enable the city to thrive once again.  Detroit needs a huge amount of new investment and at least tens (or more likely, hundreds) of thousands of new people and businesses who have the means to pay taxes. 

This is the time for Detroit to think far beyond the very limited resources of just the city or even the state. Detroit needs to develop a plan for structural change that is likely to easily cost billions of dollars over at least a 10-20 year period.  Because of the huge amount of resources required, we must recognize that it is likely that one of the major contributors to this process will have to be the federal government, working in concert with private enterprise. We must organize to achieve that goal and there is no better time than now to do so. We must develop a sound plan and convince key decision-makers that it will be a “no-brainer” to generate very high returns on this huge investment.

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Moody's reviewing thousands of U.S. muni obligations | Reuters

Moody's reviewing thousands of U.S. muni obligations | Reuters

(Reuters) - Moody's Investors Service is sweeping a magnifying glass over thousands of U.S. municipal sector obligations that are linked to 26 banks currently under review for possible credit rating downgrades, it said on Tuesday.

"The news could cause worry in the $3.7 trillion municipal bond market, where issuers have for the most part been successfully extending or replacing letters of credit and other expiring facilities backing their debt.

A bubble in bank letters of credit developed when the auction-rate securities market collapsed and issuers moved their money into variable-rate bonds, which need the facilities to serve as lines of credit during remarketing.

Many facilities provided during the financial crisis of 2007-08 expired last year, affecting approximately $130 billion of variable-rate bonds and issuers began turning to U.S. banks as concerns grew over financial problems in Europe."

Monday, February 13, 2012

China tells banks to roll over local government loans: FT | Reuters

China tells banks to roll over local government loans: FT | Reuters
"China encouraged banks to lend to local governments for new projects during the financial crisis to buoy the economy, but its provinces and cities now face $1.7 trillion in debts. More than half those loans were scheduled to come due over the next three years, the newspaper said. Banks had started extending maturities for local governments to avoid a wave of defaults, the paper said, citing bankers and analysts familiar with the matter."

Fred Leeb: Is the global house of cards built on a house of cards?

Sunday, February 12, 2012

Atlantic City's future looking bright after week of positive news - pressofAtlanticCity.com: Atlantic City | Pleasantville | Brigantine

Atlantic City's future looking bright after week of positive news - pressofAtlanticCity.com: Atlantic City | Pleasantville | Brigantine

Maybe we can learn something from Atlantic City's efforts and success in implementing a long term plan. Please see excerpts from the article below:

While casino win figures released Friday were not positive, Atlantic City’s overall economy is on the brink of a turnaround likely to result in an investment stampede, predicted Israel Posner, executive director of Lloyd D. Levenson Institute of Gaming, Hospitality and Tourism at the Richard Stockton College of New Jersey.

“It’s the idea that we’ve been discussing for many years, that Atlantic City is transforming into a full-scale entertainment resort,” Posner said. “That transformation, that vision, is emerging in full bloom. You can see it this summer. You can feel the energy all over the city.

Posner also said that investors who have been shunning the city for the past few years now will be tempted to take a second look. He cautioned that they could lose out if they wait too long.

“I think that what could happen very quickly is that investors will be tripping over each other,” he said. “If you’re late, the opportunities are not there. The early participants that are drawn by the excitement have the most to gain because they are coming in during the threshold of the transformation. If you wait, the risk will be lower, but the reward will be lower, too.”

The Atlantic City Tourism District Master Plan, approved by the CRDA Board Feb. 1, advised that Atlantic City diversify offerings and perhaps partner with other towns on artistic, cultural and other nongaming initiatives. The marketing strategies behind the events themselves matter, too, particularly with social media, the 300-page document stated.

“Everyone is excited and understands we’re in it together, and need to work as a team,” Palmieri said.“That’s a positive thing. And from what I understand, that’s a new thing for this city.”

Saturday, February 11, 2012

How the Stimulus Fell Short - NYTimes.com

How the Stimulus Fell Short - NYTimes.com
"... The stimulus — a historic package of tax cuts, safety-net spending, infrastructure projects and green-energy investments — certainly did a lot of good. As the economists Alan S. Blinder and Mark Zandi have noted, it’s one of the key reasons the unemployment rate isn’t in double digits now.
But the stimulus ultimately failed to bring about a strong, sustainable recovery. Money was spread far and wide rather than dedicated to programs with the most bang for the buck. “Shovel-ready” projects, those that would put people to work right away, took too long to break ground. Investments in worthwhile long-term projects, on the other hand, were often rushed to meet arbitrary deadlines, and the resulting shoddy outcomes tarnished the projects’ image...."
****************************************************
Fred Leeb: I find it ironic that after spending $840 billion we now may be concerned about whether these programs accomplished anything. I also find it interesting that it takes the NYT Sunday Review to consider the concept newsworthy that the government should generate a significant return on its investments.
I think one of the biggest failures of government is that this simple business concept (return on investment) is barely an afterthought. It is a tragedy that the US government collected and spent almost a trillion tax dollars, generated by millions of people working very efficiently and very hard to provide, without a clear idea of the projected benefits.

People need to ask what it means in the first place for the government to create jobs. There is a big difference between jobs for government employees and jobs that are created due to a nurturing environment for the private sector. For example, some of this money could have been spent on improving government decision-making, developing multiple-year growth plans, consolidating and rationalizing government entities, making government more efficient, providing venture capital, jobs training, adding funding for community colleges and public schools, etc. Programs like cash for clunkers did bring forward car sales, causing lower car sales immediately thereafter. Temporary jobs repaving roads were just that, temporary jobs. We must make the government much more accountable before the dollars are spent.

Friday, February 10, 2012

Commentary: Detroit faces worse fate than an EM | The Detroit News | detroitnews.com

Commentary: Detroit faces worse fate than an EM | The Detroit News | detroitnews.com

The article from February 10, 2012 by John E. Mogk, a law professor at Wayne State University, states, "... municipal bankruptcy under Chapter 9 of the Federal Bankruptcy Act, which could be more damaging to the city and the state and take much longer to complete.

Seeking bankruptcy relief would downgrade the city's credit rating, reduce its ability to borrow funds, and drive up the city's interest rates. The credit standing of other municipalities in Michigan and the state will also be affected. Bankruptcy requires substantial additional management responsibilities, leaving staffers less time to actually govern.
Perhaps the most damaging aspect of bankruptcy is that it will place a stigma on the city, causing new businesses to avoid locating in Detroit."
*********************************************************


Fred Leeb: My own question is, how do we know that this conventional wisdom is true? The business world lived in fear of the bankruptcy stigma but this has changed over the last 35 years and bankruptcy is now virtually just another tool in the toolbox to enable lasting structural change. Are GM's borrowing rates higher or lower now than prior to their bankruptcy? In addition, I believe there have been a number of studies showing that publicly traded stocks rise after there is an announcement of a major cost reduction program. This is because the action is an indicator that the management has finally recognized the depth of the problem and is willing to do something constructive rather than just cover it up.

Everybody already knows that Detroit is in terrible financial shape. It will remain that way until people believe that the city's leadership is willing to bite the bullet and implement a realistic multiple-year turnaround plan. As far as the city's bond rating goes, the only reason it is able to sell bonds at all now is because they are backed by other entities such as the state. This has only enabled the problem to fester and get worse. If people knew that other entities would not stand behind the city's bonds, they probably could not be sold at all, even now, before a bankruptcy has been filed. The only people we are kidding about Detroit is ourselves.

Friday, February 3, 2012

The Cost-Benefit Imperative

The Cost-Benefit Imperative

It's very refreshing to see in the following article by Susan K. Urahn that one of the most fundamental financial concepts, return on investment, is becoming an essential element of government spending plans. It is clear that even governments no longer have enough money today to just throw it at make-work projects to create jobs that are a bridge to nowhere. This analytical approach also has been a means of breaking partisan gridlock, a byproduct that also is sorely needed.  Unless the government does its homework so that each dollar generates a high return for the taxpayer it shouldn't take the money.

Susan K. Urahn is managing director of the Washington, D.C.-based Pew Center on the States, where she leads the Pew Charitable Trusts' efforts to help states identify and implement policies that are fiscally sound and provide a return on investment to taxpayers.

**********************

The Cost-Benefit Imperative

A group of states is adapting a successful model to target scarce funds for the greatest return on investment.



While the states' revenues are beginning to recover, almost all of them expect to have less to spend in 2012 than they had in 2008, before the Great Recession began exacting its toll. Since then, many states have relied on across-the-board cuts, but others have looked for ways to make more strategic decisions that target funds toward programs and policies that yield the greatest benefits in the most cost-effective way.

Cost/benefit analysis can play a key role in helping government leaders make better decisions on allocating limited tax dollars. This technique estimates the long-term costs and benefits of potential investments in public programs, allowing policy makers to compare options and identify those that most effectively achieve outcomes (such as reducing crime, improving high-school graduation rates or reducing child maltreatment) at the lowest cost to taxpayers.
Cost/benefit analysis has been used to a limited degree at the federal level for many years. Some states, including Oregon, Georgia and New York, have used this technique to assess individual programs, such as evaluating whether an economic development incentive is cost-effective in creating jobs. But one state has developed an approach that goes much further.
Since the 1990s, legislators and executive agencies in Washington State have used a cutting-edge model to identify evidence-based policies that provide the best return on taxpayers' investment. The model was developed by the nonpartisan Washington State Institute for Public Policy, which the legislature created to analyze and provide data for policy makers.

The model goes far beyond traditional methods. It:

• Analyzes all available research across an entire policy area to systematically identify which programs work and which don't, rather than relying on a few studies or anecdotal evidence.
• Predicts the impact of policy options by applying the combined evidence of all sufficiently rigorous national studies to the state's own data.
• Calculates the potential return on investment of policy options, taking into account the effect on taxpayers, program participants and residents most directly affected in both the short and long term.
• Assesses the investment risk if the initial assumptions behind the estimates turn out differently than predicted.
• Ranks the projected benefits, costs and risks of all programs in a guide to policy options.
• Identifies ineffective programs that could be cut or eliminated so that policy makers can make strategic decisions instead of across-the-board reductions.
• Analyzes the combined benefits and costs of a package or "portfolio" of policies instead of judging each program separately.
• Works with legislators and the executive branch to make these analyses highly accessible for policy and budget decision-makers.

Washington State's most extensive experience with this model has been in the criminal-justice arena. Officials have used the analysis and recommendations generated by the model to direct funding toward proven crime-prevention and treatment programs. Those initiatives have contributed to a greater improvement in crime rates and juvenile-arrest rates compared with the national average, an incarceration rate lower than the national average, and savings of $1.3 billion per two-year budget cycle—eliminating the need to build new prisons and making it possible to close an adult prison and a juvenile-detention facility.

Legislators from both parties say the model has helped them get the best return on investment, transcend partisan gridlock, make decisions based on facts and choose options that are the most cost-effective in the long run, even if they are not the most politically appealing in the short term.

*****************
Please click on the link above to see the rest of the article.